7 Grocery Hacks to Lower Your Costs

These days, it seems like prices are going up, especially at the grocery story. In fact, the all-item Consumer Price Index (CPI), a measure of economy-wide inflation, claimed food prices in September 2026 were 2.5 percent…

4 min read

7 Grocery Hacks to Lower Your CostsThese days, it seems like prices are going up, especially at the grocery story. In fact, the all-item Consumer Price Index (CPI), a measure of economy-wide inflation, claimed food prices in September 2026 were 2.5 percent higher than in September 2025. But don’t despair, there are some ways to save. Here are some quick hacks you can use to beat price creep.

Get Supermarket Apps

Your phone’s app store probably has an app from your neighborhood grocery store just waiting for your download. When you get it, make sure you join the loyalty program, where points can add up. Plus, check out the weekly/daily deals and take advantage of them. If you do this regularly, you’ll save a large chunk of change.

Keep Your Coupon Books

You know those booklets you get in the mail from the local grocery store that are pages long, usually show up on Tuesdays and you throw them away? Don’t. Save them, scour them and snag low prices. Make this a regular habit and you’ll definitely save.

Save the Coupons in the Bag

Related to the above item, there are often coupons stuffed into the bottom of your bag during checkout. Make sure you look to see whether you might use them, then put them in a safe place and grab them the next time you head out.

Make a List

Before you leave the house, jot down what you need. In fact, start an evergreen list on your phone in your notes tab that you can update with each grocery run. If you stick to the list, there’s a big chance you won’t buy things you won’t eat and/or rack up a big bill. Another hack? Never go to the grocery store hungry. You might end up buying more than you need and regret it later!

Give Meat the Day Off

Meat is one item that’s most always on the rise. In fact, as of April 2026, ground beef was priced on average $6.90 per pound, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. So, what to do? Try to swap it with black beans, tempeh, tofu or any other non-meat protein. Cook these delicious meals several times a week and if you’re interested, browse these meatless dinner ideas. Over time, you’ll save a lot of MOO-lah.

Use Curbside Pickup

If you’re pressed for time and/or struggle with impulse buying, this is the hack for you. When you order food online, chances are you’ll order only essentials and not the goodies that call your name when you’re in the store. Best of all, at most big box stores like Target, Walmart and Kroger, the service is free. Another plus: You’ll be able to see your total – and if it’s a bit high, you can edit it and reduce your cost.

Eat Your Leftovers

If you really want to save on groceries, heat up your meal from the day before. Resist throwing it away, going out or ordering takeout on the way home. One way to make eating leftovers go the distance is to make a double portion. This way, you won’t be stuck with a tiny bit of food that sits in your fridge uneaten for days.

If you integrate these hacks into your daily routine, over time, you’ll notice a difference and prevent high prices from eating into your budget.

Sources

Food Price Outlook – Summary Findings | Economic Research Service

6 Ways To Cut Grocery Costs as Inflation Jumps Again

Required Minimum Distribution Tactics

At age 73, investors must begin taking distributions from tax-deferred retirement accounts, even if still working. One exception: many workplace plans let you delay RMDs…

4 min read

Required Minimum Distribution TacticsAt age 73, investors must begin taking distributions from tax-deferred retirement accounts, even if still working. One exception: many workplace plans let you delay RMDs from your current employer’s plan until you retire if you are still employed and own no more than 5 percent of the business; IRAs and former employers’ plans get no such break. (Those born in 1960 or later start at age 75.) If you fail to take the full required minimum distribution (RMD), the IRS charges a 25 percent penalty on the shortfall, reduced to 10 percent if corrected within about two years. The rules cover traditional IRAs along with 401(k) and 403(b) plans; Roth IRAs and Roth 401(k)s are exempt during the owner’s lifetime, though inherited Roth accounts are.

Each year’s deadline is Dec. 31. Your RMD amount is fixed by your balance on the prior Dec. 31, so timing does not change what you owe; waiting until year end simply keeps the money growing tax-deferred longer. The initial RMD is due for the year in which you turn 73. You can wait as late as April 1 the following year, but that stacks two distributions into a single tax year, which could push you into a higher bracket. RMDs are taxed as regular income.

Roth Conversion

If you expect RMDs to push you into a higher bracket, shrink your tax-deferred balances before they begin. In the years before age 73, ideally low-income years after you retire, you can convert part of a traditional IRA or 401(k) to a Roth IRA. A conversion moves money directly from the pre-tax account to the Roth, so the annual Roth contribution limit, earned-income requirement and 10 percent early-withdrawal penalty do not apply. The amount converted is taxed as regular income that year, but the assets then grow tax-free with no lifetime RMDs. Two cautions: once RMDs begin, the year’s RMD must be withdrawn first and cannot itself be converted, and each conversion carries its own five-year holding period.

In-Kind Distributions

An in-kind RMD transfers securities from your retirement account to a taxable brokerage account without selling them first. The RMD amount is still taxed as regular income, but the shares stay invested. Because no cash changes hands, nothing is withheld; most custodians ask you to waive withholding or sell enough shares to cover it. If you waive it, cover the tax through estimated payments to avoid an underpayment penalty.

Your cost basis resets to the shares’ fair market value on the distribution date, and a new holding period begins. Growth after that is taxed at the lower long-term capital gain rate once the shares have been held more than a year.

For example, assume you distribute stock worth $20,000 that was bought inside the IRA for $12,000. The full $20,000 is taxed as regular income, not just the $8,000 of growth, because none of that money has been taxed yet. Your basis in the taxable account becomes $20,000, so you later pay capital gains tax only on appreciation above that.

Batching RMDs – Or Not

Many retirees hold more than one IRA (traditional, rollover, SEP or SIMPLE), and each has its own RMD. Although each account’s figure is calculated separately, you may add them together and withdraw the combined amount from whichever of those IRAs you prefer. The same rule applies among 403(b)s. You may not aggregate across account types: each 401(k) requires its own RMD, and inherited IRAs cannot be combined with your own (only with each other, if from the same decedent).

Qualified Charitable Distributions (QCD)

For the charity minded, a qualified charitable distribution has your IRA custodian pay a charity directly on your behalf. The amount satisfies some or all of your RMD yet never enters your taxable income, which lowers your adjusted gross income and helps whether or not you itemize. QCDs are available from age 70½, must come from an IRA (not a 401(k)), must be paid by the custodian directly to the charity, and cannot go to donor-advised funds or private foundations. The 2026 cap is $111,000 per person. Tell your tax preparer; the 1099-R will not flag it.

 

How to Account for Bonds

With the global bond market size bigger than many of the world’s biggest economies, it’s important for businesses that sell bonds to understand how to report transactions properly. According to the International Capital Market…

3 min read

How to Account for BondsWith the global bond market size bigger than many of the world’s biggest economies, it’s important for businesses that sell bonds to understand how to report transactions properly. According to the International Capital Market Association (ICMA), the global bond market’s capitalization is more than $128 trillion.

Defining Bonds

Offered by government or corporate entities, bonds are a static commitment issued to investors. Entities earn money from investors to invest in infrastructure or support operations. Investors receive a coupon payment periodically, and the bond is settled at a future date, which is referred to as the maturity date.   

When bonds are tendered, they may be done at a discount, at face value, or at a premium. The valuation relies on the gap at issuance between a bond’s coupon rate and the bond’s yield based on prevailing prices. Upon bond issuance, the bond’s face value is recorded under bonds payable, as the issuing entity receives payment for the bond’s prevailing market value. If there’s a positive difference, it’s recorded at a premium. If there’s a negative difference, it’s recorded at a discount.

Bond Issuance and Accounting Considerations

When sold at par value, after the corporation or government entity receives payment from investors, the issuing entity records it as a liability because it’s liable for the investor’s investment. This would be set up as:

 
    Debit Credit
Cash   $100  
  Bonds Payable   $100

 

Bonds Payable Defined

Since the entity owes the investor, bonds payable is recorded on the liability section of a business’ balance sheet. Much of the time, bonds payable are reported as non-current liabilities.

When sold at a discount, a gap exists between a bond’s par value and the monetary investment the issuing entity obtains from the investor; the issuing entity must record the transaction as a discount on bonds payable account. The journal entry is as follows:

 

    Debit Credit
Cash   $100  
Discount on Bonds Payable   $100 $100
  Bonds Payable   $100

 

If bonds are purchased at a premium, which is when investors pay more for a bond with a higher interest rate, providing higher coupon payments, entities must record it as a premium on bonds payable (POBP) account. It often occurs when purchasers agree to lesser earnings due to the bond having a higher rate than prevailing rates. In the case of a bond’s issuance at a premium, it can be recorded as follows:

    Debit Credit
Cash   $100  
  POBP   $100
  Bonds Payable   $100

 

If there’s a discount on bonds payable, the recurrent record must reflect the interest expense with a debit transaction and the bonds payable entry must see a credit. This accounting method impacts the bond issuer by growing the total interest expense, which the issuer records.

If, however, the issuer receives payment from investors beyond the face value, the interest expense must be credited, and the premium on bonds payable entry should receive a debit.

Conclusion

Whether it’s a business issuing bonds or an investor evaluating a company, understanding how to account for bonds is essential to evaluate a business’ financial health.

Pre-Election Focus on Russian/Iran Sanctions, AI Utility Bills, Crypto Regulation and Nondiscriminatory FEMA Assistance

Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (HR 6500) – This appropriations bill was finalized and passed…

4 min read

Pre-Election Focus, AI Utility Bills, Crypto RegulationContinuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2027 (HR 6500) – This appropriations bill was finalized and passed by both the House and the Senate on Sept. 1. The act funds the fiscal year 2027 government budget through Dec. 11 at current levels. It was signed by the President on Sept. 2.

Prison Staff Safety Enhancement Act (S 307) – This bill is designed to address sexual harassment and sexual assault of Bureau of Prisons correctional officers and other staff by incarcerated prisoners. Specifically, it details national standards for the prevention, reduction, and punishment of perpetrators. The legislation was introduced by Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) on Jan. 29, 2025. It passed in the Senate on April 29, 2025; in the House on Aug. 31; and was enacted by the president on Sept. 16.

Retire through Ownership Act (S 2403) – Introduced by Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) on July 23, 2025, this bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. ESOPs are Employee Stock Ownership Plans that enable employees to accrue shares of their employers’ stock as part of a pension plan, in which they receive the cash value of their shares upon retirement. This bill clearly defines how a good-faith valuation should be determined by independent professional appraisers, based on IRS Revenue Ruling 59-60 for valuing privately held stock. In the past, ambiguous valuation methods have resulted in litigation. This act passed in the Senate on October 9, 2025, and in the House on Sept. 16. It currently awaits the president’s signature.

Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026 (HR 5334) – This largely bipartisan act was championed by the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). The legislation imposes a variety of sanctions, tariffs, and prohibitions related to Russia and Iran, and explicitly prohibits U.S. persons from making new investments in Russia. It also expands the tax deduction for early childhood education teachers for classroom expenses. The bill was introduced on Sept. 11, 2025, by Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-CA). It passed in the House on April 27 and in the Senate on Aug. 7, with final changes agreed upon on Sept. 16. The president signed the bill into law a day later.

Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (HR 3633) – Known as the Clarity Act, the purpose of this Trump Administration-backed bill is to implement the first regulations for the crypto sector. The bill was introduced by Rep. French Hill (R-AR) on May 29, 2025. It passed in the House on July 17, 2025. However, opponents of the bill say the industry-led standards are far too lenient and do not provide enough safeguards. The bill recently failed in the Senate after a party-line cloture vote, which means the debate ended before the floor could vote on the bill (considered a filibuster). The cloture vote does not rule out the Senate trying again at a later date.

Ratepayer Protection Act (HR 9340) – In an effort to rein in AI data center utility costs, this bill would require state utilities to consider adopting standards to ensure cost recovery for the generation, transmission, and distribution services of large-load electricity customers. This high-stakes, bipartisan issue comes ahead of the midterm elections in an effort to assure voters that local data centers will not ramp up local residents’ utility bills. The legislation was introduced by Rep. Gabe Evans (R-CO) on June 18. It passed in the House on Sept. 16 and currently resides in the Senate.

Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act (HR 1342) – Current law states that federal major disaster emergency relief and assistance must be provided without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, nationality, sex, age, disability, English proficiency or economic status. The bill, introduced by Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA) on Feb. 13, 2025, would add political affiliation protection under this requirement. The act passed in the House on Sept. 16 and awaits consideration in the Senate.

 

AI-Powered Corporate Fraud: What Business Leaders Need to Know

For years, corporate fraud was limited by the costs, expertise and resources required to carry out a convincing deception. Artificial intelligence (AI) has changed this…

4 min read

AI FraudFor years, corporate fraud was limited by the costs, expertise, and resources required to carry out a convincing deception. Artificial intelligence (AI) has changed this.

Today, AI can create realistic voices, videos, emails, invoices, identities, and customer interactions at a scale and speed that traditional fraud controls were never designed to address. AI-powered fraud is a governance, financial, and strategic risk – not just an IT problem.

The Evolution of Corporate Fraud

Fraud is no longer limited to static phishing emails. Threat actors, from organized criminal syndicates to rogue insiders, use large language models and advanced machine learning to execute complex, multilayered fraud schemes.

One of the most cited reference cases is the 2024 Arup incident. A finance employee at the engineering firm’s Hong Kong office was tricked into transferring about $25 million across multiple transactions after joining a video conference call with deepfake replicas of the company’s CFO and other colleagues. The fraud succeeded because it targeted the human authorization step, the exact step where financial controls assume identity can be trusted on sight and sound.

Beyond deepfake executives, new trends include synthetic vendor creation, where generative models fabricate entire corporate entities. Each comes complete with tax IDs, websites, regulatory filings, and executive profiles. They are used to infiltrate accounts payable systems. Bad actors also use machine learning to reverse-engineer enterprise anti-fraud algorithms, find blind spots, and execute micro-transactions that stay beneath detection thresholds.

Why the Numbers Should Worry Boards, Not Just Security Teams

AI-powered scams grew 1,210 percent in 2025, more than six times the growth rate of traditional fraud. Deepfake video scams alone went up 700 percent. The 2026 International AI Safety Report confirmed the tooling behind this is free or low-cost, requires no technical skills, and can be deployed anonymously.

The 2026 INTERPOL Global Financial Fraud Threat Assessment flagged AI-powered fraud as one of organized crime’s primary growth sectors. It reports that fraud alerts have risen 54 percent since 2024, with more than 1,500 cross-border cases involving $1.1 billion in lost assets.

The Regulatory Gap Executives Should Worry About

Regulation is accelerating, but it is not solving the fraud problem. The EU AI Act’s transparency provisions took effect Aug. 2. It requires the disclosure of AI-generated content, with penalties for noncompliance. As of July 2026, 48 states in the United States have enacted at least one deepfake-related law, according to Ballotpedia’s tracker. Yet none of these frameworks is really built for enterprise fraud. They target content moderation, disclosure, and non-consensual media. None directly addresses the authorization workflows attackers actually exploit. A company that is fully compliant with deepfake laws would still be exposed by the Arup scenario.

Regulators such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have signaled that using AI to deceive is prosecutable under existing fraud statutes, but enforcement is reactive and case-by-case. Executives who treat fraud as just a criminal act rather than a governance failure arising from inadequate technical oversight face severe personal and corporate liability.

Strategic Challenges and Recommended Actions

Defending against AI-powered fraud requires rethinking how security spending is justified. Traditional ROI models rely on historical loss avoidance, but in the age of generative fraud, past losses are an unreliable predictor of future exposure.

The primary implementation challenge is friction versus security. Deploying stronger authentication and behavior monitoring across corporate touchpoints creates friction that employees and vendors resist. In addition, integrating AI defenses into legacy enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems creates technical debt. Organizations also struggle with data silos, even though fraud detection now requires real-time visibility across all departments.

To protect enterprise value, leadership teams should move from passive compliance to active resilience.

  • Verify out of band. Require a callback to a known number and dual approval for large or unusual transfers. Never authorize a payment on a voice or video request alone.
  • Strengthen authentication. Use multifactor cryptographic verification and zero-trust principles (verify every request, regardless of source). Treat biometrics with caution, since deepfakes can spoof them.
  • Red-team for AI fraud. Have ethical hackers use generative AI to stress test internal systems and give the risk committee ownership of the results.
  • Use AI to fight AI. Deploy monitoring tools that flag behavioral anomalies across internal communications, ledger entries, and vendor registries in real time.
  • Establish cross-functional fraud task forces. Break down departmental silos and treat fraud detection as an integrated business process.

Future Outlook

As AI advances, the convergence of generative AI and autonomous software agents suggest that corporate fraud may increasingly be automated, including by self-directed AI agents operating as fraud syndicates. Business leaders must recognize that the future of corporate defense relies not on human vigilance alone, but on building resilient, self-healing digital ecosystems where trust is algorithmically verified and continuously audited.